More Assessment Author Samples

As our conversation with several noted authors approaches, I have been attempting to showcase some of their work related to the topic:  ”Formative Assessment and Grading: Creating a System of Quality Feedback for Improved Student Learning”.  The only author who is slated to participate that I have had the pleasure of meeting in person is Tom Guskey.

Last year, Mr. Guskey spoke as part of a regional grading and assessment workshop and I managed to finagle a ticket and a substitute teacher for two days.  It was well worth the effort.  On one hand, he spent much of the time talking about the purpose of grades and the implications of teachers focusing on the communication and reporting aspect of them.  This I thoroughly agreed with, and found myself nodding along as he spoke.

Then, Guskey described how he implements this philosophy in his own college classroom (although he has also used it at every other level of education from Kindergarten to high school).  This is where my opinion and his differed.

He described his “second chance” policy for retakes of major (summative) assessments.  I disagree about limiting the number of retake opportunities, but I noticed that the resistant teachers who were in my group began to agree with him.  In the years that I had tried to convince them of the value of this view of grades and assessments, I had encountered tremendous opposition.  When Guskey recounted his simple system, however, more and more of these same teachers recognized its advantage.

Before I left that event, I picked up a copy of “Ahead of the Curve: The Power of Assessment to Transform Teaching and Learning” which is edited by Doug Reeves.  It contains chapters written by a Who’s Who of assessment experts.  Tom Guskey pens a chapter on making assessments useful to both teachers and students.  This may sound a bit like Dylan Wiliam’s take on student involvement in assessment, but I think that’s a good thing.

In speaking about the strength of teacher-created authentic assessments, Guskey writes

“If desired learning goals or standards are the foundation of students’ instructional experiences, then assessments of student learning are simply extensions of those same goals and standards.  Instead of teaching to the test, teachers are more accurately ‘testing or assessing what they teach’.”

That’s a pretty clear way to explain the importance of appropriately created assessments, right?

I highly recommend Ahead of the Curve, not just for Guskey’s chapter but also for essays by Ken O’Connor, Rick Stiggins, Dylan Wiliam, Doug Reeves, Bob Marzano, Linda Gregg, and even Rick DuFour.  Each essay/chapter is perfect for a short book study in a PLC, or simply to read before planning out your next instructional unit.

If these topics get you thinking and make you want to explore them more deeply, I encourage you to join us here from October 6-8 for the Voicethread conversation about assessment and grading.  Look for more information about how to use Voicethread and some tips for making the most of a digital conversation later this week and early next week.

Talking Today about Teaching Tomorrow

Many of the readers of this blog have taken part in focused conversations in the past with Solution Tree authors, including the Voicethread that I moderated earlier this year around 21st Century Skills.  Well, friend and fellow edublogger Bill Ferriter is at it again.  Over on the Tempered Radical, Bill is running a Voicethread conversation about teaching in the 21st century with his co-author Adam Garry and another fantastic Solution Tree author, Meg Ormiston.

I invite everyone to swing by and check it out today through Saturday.  I’ll be there (as my alter ego, Mister Monkey) chiming in, learning, and asking questions.  I hope to see you there, too!

21st Century Skills Conversation: Wrap-up

This weekend brought an end to our four-day Voicethread conversation between Scripted Spontaneity readers and several of the experts behind the new book, 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn.  I’ve posted a lot here recently about the conversation (here, here, here, here, and here), and the purpose of the entry is to share what I personally learned from the participants.  Keep in mind that while no new comments can be added at this point, the Voicethread will continue to be viewable for the foreseeable future at this link.

Before doing that, though, I want to reinforce the importance of conversations like the one that we just completed.  First, the asynchronous, web-based nature of Voicethread yet again proved it to be an excellent tool for bringing together colleagues from all over the world and all over the education spectrum.  Second, an opportunity to interact with other eager educators and experts (that’s a mouthful, huh?) is a rejuvenating experience for us.  We are reminded that the work ahead is mammoth in its scale but critical in its importance, and that we are supported by some very smart people at every level.  Finally, we must remember to make the best of these discussions to reach out to the novice teachers around us inducting them into “the club” while pulling in veteran teachers who are stuck in the kiddie pool.

Throughout the Voicethread conversation, several strands stood out as contentious or engaging enough to stimulate a lot of discussion.  When I look back on what I learned over the past week, three themes pushed my thinking the most:

  1. While change most often comes from outsiders, this term is difficult to define in education.  Participants like Bethany, bplibrarian, and Chris Dede made it clear to me that an ideal educational leader has elements of being an insider (understands the system, knows the challenges firsthand) as well as some of the characteristics of an outsider (willingness to challenge the status quo, objective perspective).
  2. The various frameworks that define and describe 21st Century Skills are exceedingly diverse, and this may not be a bad thing.  While several of the book’s contributors chimed in about the challenges posed by this diversity, it also became clear to me that the “competition” among various frameworks brings new ideas and strategies to the table.
  3. The key to well-prepared modern educational leaders is a combination of training and assessment.  Simply identifying those with the greatest potential as leaders is not enough.  We must put into place processes that actively train would-be administrators and school leaders and then require them to show proficiency in the areas that we deem most important.

I would like to take this opportunity to show my gratitude to the many folks who helped make this conversation so successful.  To the book contributors, especially Chris Dede, Nancy Frey, Brian M. Pete, and Jim Bellanca, thank you for the time and effort that you put into this project.  To the participants who added their views and experiences–bplibrarian, Stephanie, Luke, and Bethany, in particular–I know firsthand how difficult it is to find “free time” to engage in meaningful personal and professional development.  Thanks to the good folks at Solution Tree for their help in putting together the conversation, recognizing the power of digital tools to facilitate interactions between authors and their audience.

21st Century Skills Conversation: Day 3

As we enter the final day of our engaging Voicethread conversation about 21st Century Skills, the discussion has become much more dynamic and exciting.  Both experts and visitors alike have raised interesting questions related to the vast diversity of frameworks for understanding and defining these skills.  John Barell addresses the question of expense when it comes to Problem-Based Learning, making a convincing argument that these methods can actually cost less than traditional paper-based educational materials.

Thanks to everyone who has participated so far, making this a fantastic learning experience for all of us.  Remember, you still have one more day to add your voice.  The final Voicethread will remain archived on the site for you to view and share in the future.

So, take a few minutes and express yourself: http://voicethread.com/share/1185437/

21st Century Skills Conversation: Day 2

The second day of our asynchronous discussion around 21st Century Skills has yielded more intriguing questions.  We’ve seen several of the contributors, including Chris Dede and Nancy Frey, add in their two cents worth on the other themes, creating a unique learning environment for all.

My favorite strand today has been the ongoing back-and-forth about Problem Based Learning.  Chris Dede has added some real insight about the ability of the human brain to learn simple skills in the context of more complex ones, rather than prior to the complexity.  This flies so brazenly in the face of the curricula in place in most public schools.  Does reform need to begin there?

It’s not too late to join in the conversation!  Take a few minutes of your day tomorrow or Saturday and share your experience with us.  You’ll take away something meaningful, and add to the learning going on for everyone.

Your task for Day 3 is to ask a difficult question.  Push someone’s thinking!